"Rob Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We are doing something similar.
>> What I really want is a no-arg constructor
>> so that I can setup a port and socket factory
>> in a derived class before the base class constructor
>> initialiases the web server.
>>
>
> Sounds cool - our needs are m
> WE had this problem as well, and we didn't even bother to subclass, we just
> changed the word protected to public and let it be.
Yep - thought about that myself, but wanted to run on a "vanilla" XML/RPC
version without custom mods. Using a subclass let me do this.
> But I do think there ough
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dynamic Web Server port assignment
Part of our app. creates a "callback" web server, for receiving asynchronous
event notification.
I'd like to have the WebServer class pick a dynamic port for me, and from
what I
c
> We are doing something similar.
> What I really want is a no-arg constructor
> so that I can setup a port and socket factory
> in a derived class before the base class constructor
> initialiases the web server.
>
Sounds cool - our needs are much more basic than this, but no harm in having
mo
2002 10:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dynamic Web Server port assignment
Part of our app. creates a "callback" web server, for receiving asynchronous
event notification.
I'd like to have the WebServer class pick a dynamic port for me, and from
what I
can see if a pass a po
Part of our app. creates a "callback" web server, for receiving asynchronous
event notification.
I'd like to have the WebServer class pick a dynamic port for me, and from what I
can see if a pass a port number of "0" into the constructor it will do this. Snag is,
the serverSocket field is a pr
