Nicolas RAOUL wrote:
> John Wilson's license states:
> "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the
> above copyright notice, this list of conditions and
> the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or
> other materials provided with the distribution."
>
> My java project include the x
Andrew Evers wrote:
In any case, the MinML license would have to be brought up with
the license holder (whom I believe is on this list).
Andrew.
This brings up an interesting point. Could I create my own
xmlrpc-1-1.jar that does not include the uk.co.wilson tree and avoid any
MinML licensin
> My java project include the xmlrpc-1.1.jar, so it also includes MinML,
> which has a BSD-like license.
>
> Can I release and distribute my project under the GNU-GPL license ?
>
> Can I apply the GNU-GPL to my own code and ship it in a tar.gz
> including xmlrpc-1.1.jar ?
>
> In that case, can I sa
John Wilson's license states:
"Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the
above copyright notice, this list of conditions and
the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or
other materials provided with the distribution."
My java project include the xmlrpc-1.1.jar, so it also includes
