On 20 Jan 2004, at 18:40, Ken Gengler wrote:
On Jan 19, 2004, at 10:49 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
I still take issue with
What characters are allowed in strings? Non-printable characters?
Null characters? Can a "string" be used to hold an arbitrary chunk
of
binary data?
Any characters a
On Jan 19, 2004, at 10:49 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
I still take issue with
What characters are allowed in strings? Non-printable characters?
Null characters? Can a "string" be used to hold an arbitrary chunk
of
binary data?
Any characters are allowed in a string except < and &, which a
"Daniel L. Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's a patch to
> add that ability back in for Unicode encodings, encodings which I
> believe XML parsers are required to support by the XML specification.
There are quite a few XML-RPC endpoints that don't use "real" XML
parsers.
- a
Ed Korthof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Look for the update at the bottom (2003/06/30).
Oh my god, I can't believe he actually FINALLY did it. I must've
begged Dave to do this at least thirty times back in 2001/2002. Ed,
thanks for bringing this to my attention.
I still take issue with
Wh
On 20 Jan 2004, at 03:32, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
I'd like to be able to send multibyte characters over XML-RPC. In CVS
revision 1.4, we basically removed this ability with the following log
message:
revision 1.4
date: 2002/08/20 16:48:49; author: dlr; state: Exp; lin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:19:25PM -0800, Adam Megacz wrote:
>
> "Daniel L. Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here's a patch to
> > add that ability back in for Unicode encodings, encodings which I
> > believe XML parsers are required to support by the XML specification.
>
> There are quite a
