Nevermind, Jochen already posted one.
Ryan
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Ryan Bloom wrote:
OK, I'll post the patch today.
Ryan
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Di, 2004-06-15 at 19:01, Ryan Bloom wrote:
So, I have one option (which kind of sucks), I can cast the byte[]
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Adam Jack wrote:
I am trying to get xmlrpc building, and I am running into problems with
commons-codec 1.2.
Yup, Gump found these a few weeks ago. Basically the view from this
list/community (of which I am just an observer, not a participant) is -- use
codec 1.1,
I am trying to get xmlrpc building, and I am running into problems with
commons-codec 1.2.
Basically, the problem is in calling Base64.encode and .decode.
Essentially, the code 1.1 release had two encode and decode methods, one
that accepted a byte[] and the other accepted an Object. In
On Di, 2004-06-15 at 19:01, Ryan Bloom wrote:
So, I have one option (which kind of sucks), I can cast the byte[] to an
Object in the calls to encode/decode to retain compatibility between codec
1.1 and 1.2.
Let it suck. :-) If you do that change, it will prevent a lot of hazzle
and
