Greetings -
I got a nasty little suprise when I tried to use XML-RPC from within an
unsigned applet. The XmlRpcClient's worker threads are instances of XmlRpc
and XmlRpc.parse() contains the following code:
if (parserClass == null) {
// try to get the name of the SAX driver fr
You want to use Xerces in an applet!
Hope you've got plenty of bandwidth;)
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: "Stuart Roll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: Running XmlRpcClien
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: XmlRpcServer found un-streamy
[snip]
> > 1. It might be reasonable to perform two passes over the result
> > object, one to compute the content len
Have you done any performance testing on this new code? Historically we had
quite a bit of problems with people reporting very poor performance with
large (multi megabyte) Base64 values (Yes, people do do this sort of thing
with XML-RPC!). I think Hannes did some tuning work on the old code.
John
on 2/19/02 11:47 AM, "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you done any performance testing on this new code? Historically we had
> quite a bit of problems with people reporting very poor performance with
> large (multi megabyte) Base64 values (Yes, people do do this sort of thing
> wit
dlr 02/02/19 12:41:35
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcServer.java
Log:
getWorker() now prints a warning when 95% of the workers are in use if
debug is on.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +6 -1 xml-rpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/XmlRpcServer.java
dlr 02/02/19 12:43:26
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcServer.java
Log:
JavaDoc formatting for 80 columns.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +25 -15xml-rpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/XmlRpcServer.java
Index: XmlRpcServer.java
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [patch] catalina base64, optimizations and code cleanup
[snip]
> My decision to use Catalina' code is based entirely on the fact that
> Catal
on 2/19/02 12:46 PM, "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My decision to use Catalina' code is based entirely on the fact that
>> Catalina is *by far* the most used piece of software on Jakarta. Something
>> like 100-200,000 downloads/week. If the Base64 implementation sucked, it
>> would
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [patch] catalina base64, optimizations and code cleanup
> "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> At CollabNet, we aren't passing binary da
dlr 02/02/19 14:13:48
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcProxyServlet.java
Log:
JavaDoc formatting for 80 columns.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +3 -4 xml-rpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/XmlRpcProxyServlet.java
Index: XmlRpcProxyServlet.java
==
Apologies to all - this was intended to be an off list reply.
I'm *really* embarrassed to have screwed this up.
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
jon 02/02/19 14:20:10
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcServer.java
Log:
no functional changes. just code cleanup
s/debug/XmlRpc.debug
-jon
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +121 -99 xml-rpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/XmlRpcServer.java
Index: Xm
on 2/19/02 2:12 PM, "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to have offended Jon - I'm trying, off list, to sort this out. I'm
> sorry if I have cause problems - it was not my intention.
You have not offended me.
-jon
jon 02/02/19 14:23:30
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcServer.java
Log:
brackets make things so much easier to read. they are also
part of the java coding conventions.
-jon
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +4 -0 xml-rpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/X
"John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> At CollabNet, we aren't passing binary data around over XML-RPC, so
>> we won't be hitting that code.
>
> Yes, but surely Apache XML-RPC is being developed and supported for a wider
> audience than CollabNet. Or have I misunderstood something?
No, you
dlr 02/02/19 14:39:02
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc Echo.java
Log:
Added documentation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +11 -3 xml-rpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/Echo.java
Index: Echo.java
==
dlr 02/02/19 14:41:37
Modified:src/test/org/apache/xmlrpc ClientServerRpcTest.java
Log:
Added timing information to testServer().
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +14 -2 xml-rpc/src/test/org/apache/xmlrpc/ClientServerRpcTest.java
Index: ClientServerRpcTest.jav
jon 02/02/19 14:47:27
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcServer.java
Log:
only execute a Class.forName("java.lang.Object") once
-jon
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +13 -2 xml-rpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/XmlRpcServer.java
Index: XmlRpcServer.ja
dlr 02/02/19 15:01:54
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Added a commented-out Xerces JAR to the "test" target's classpath. My
unit tests to date have shown MinML to be ~60% faster than Xerces:
MinML:
Total time elapsed for 3000 iterations: 8646 milliseconds
Average ti
jon 02/02/19 15:05:05
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcServer.java
Log:
removed call to System.currentTimeMillis() unless debugging is on
don't use a "".getBytes() to get an empty byte[], pre-allocate it as a static
minor code cleanup
-jon
Revision
dlr 02/02/19 15:06:14
Modified:src/test/org/apache/xmlrpc ClientServerRpcTest.java
Log:
Added SAX_DRIVER constant, currently setup to use
uk.co.wilson.xml.MinML. This now sets the SAX driver to use in
setUp().
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +20 -2 xml-rpc/sr
jon 02/02/19 15:59:26
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
for some reason dlr removed the adding of junit to the classpath,
however, the task fails to find junit because it isn't
in the classpath. we still have the problem of not being able to
run junit unless it is in the s
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 18:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jon 02/02/19 15:59:26
>
> Modified:.build.xml
> Log:
> for some reason dlr removed the adding of junit to the classpath,
> however, the task fails to find junit because it isn't
> in the classpath. we still hav
dlr 02/02/19 17:38:24
Modified:src/test/org/apache/xmlrpc ClientServerRpcTest.java
Log:
Began implementation of testRpc() -- I'm currently having socket
binding problems. Java claims port 8081 is in use when it is not...
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +49 -20x
dlr 02/02/19 18:09:41
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcServer.java
Log:
Initialize OBJECT_CLASS in a static block in XmlRpcServer$Invoker
(rather than in its ctor).
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +15 -12xml-rpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/XmlRpcServer.j
dlr 02/02/19 18:18:19
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpcServer.java
Log:
Moved EMPTY_BYTE_ARRAY constant into Worker inner class (where it is
actually used), and reduced its visibility from package-private to
private.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +2 -1
dlr 02/02/19 18:30:38
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpc.java
Log:
Worked around problem pointed out by Stuart Roll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
where un-signed applets cannot access System properties:
o Added DEFAULT_PARSER (currently the fast MinML).
o JavaDoc'd pa
dlr 02/02/19 18:40:55
Modified:src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc XmlRpc.java
Log:
o Used a more change-resistant method of storing MinML's class name.
o Added some comments in the setDriver() implementation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +8 -1 xml-rpc/src/java/or
Hey Stuart, thanks for the note. I just check code implementing your
work-around into CVS. If you'd like to add some sort of factory for
parser creation, there would be interested in that.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html
Thanks, Dan
"Stuart Roll" <[EMA
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey Stuart, thanks for the note. I just check code implementing your
> work-around into CVS. If you'd like to add some sort of factory for
> parser creation, there would be interested in that.
Okay, now I don't always write in English this broken... ;
31 matches
Mail list logo
