Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Daniel L. Rall wrote:
Jochen, I defer to John on the timezone interpretation of what's
generally accepted as output by common server implementations.
However, like usual, I'm of the opinion that servers should be
gracious about the types of input accepted, so long as
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 09:36, John Wilson wrote:
The XML-RPC spec (http://www.xml-rpc.com/spec see the last but one
bullet point) says that timezones may not be present in a date. The
generally accepted interpretation of the spec is that only the precise
subset of ISO 8601 date/times given
On 17 Jun 2004, at 09:20, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 09:36, John Wilson wrote:
The XML-RPC spec (http://www.xml-rpc.com/spec see the last but one
bullet point) says that timezones may not be present in a date. The
generally accepted interpretation of the spec is that only the
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 10:24, John Wilson wrote:
The example in the spec does not include milliseconds - the generally
accepted interpretation of the spec (i.e. by XML-RPC implementers) is
that they are not permitted.
If so, that leaves still more room for vendor extensions ... :-)
On 17 Jun 2004, at 09:40, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 10:24, John Wilson wrote:
The example in the spec does not include milliseconds - the generally
accepted interpretation of the spec (i.e. by XML-RPC implementers) is
that they are not permitted.
If so, that leaves still more
