Hi Peter,
Apart from 3 or 4 messages which followed, all agreeing that Tom's
request was a desirable thing, 'No answer' has been the stern reply.
Has there been any discussion, anywhere?
Yes, off list. It's all been very constructive.
Why was it not on list so as to include the rest of
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:49:21PM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Peter,
Apart from 3 or 4 messages which followed, all agreeing that Tom's
request was a desirable thing, 'No answer' has been the stern reply.
Has there been any discussion, anywhere?
Yes, off list. It's all been
(stuff)
I should also add for clarity, that this means the RPCemu SVN repository on
riscos.info is now redundant. Seeing as the last change was over a year ago, I
don't think this is really going to impact on anyone.
Tom
___
Rpcemu
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 02:33:45PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 18/05/10 13:57, Peter Howkins wrote:
BTW, there isn't much to 'merge', as riscos.info is merely spoon 0.8.2
with some features added to HostFS [1]
[1] Which Spoon never commited due to knowing that HostFS had to be synced
On 18/05/10 13:57, Peter Howkins wrote:
BTW, there isn't much to 'merge', as riscos.info is merely spoon 0.8.2
with some features added to HostFS [1]
[1] Which Spoon never commited due to knowing that HostFS had to be synced
against the later Arcem changes for considerably better filecore
