), but it wasn't the default shell
and a lot of newer admins wouldn't know of its existence.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, Quentin Burdick Building
In regard to: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm-5_4: rpm/scripts/ vpkg-provides2.sh,...:
The aim is to modernize a little these shells. The comment should be clear.
Why? Was there something broken that you've fixed?
Because the change you've made actually makes them less portable.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney
more so that they're on the
public record in case any other sole is on the same path.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
In regard to: Re: Requires: python(foo) = bar, Jeffrey Johnson said (at...:
On May 11, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu wrote:
In regard to: Requires: python(foo) = bar, Jeffrey Johnson said (at 2:11pm...:
Matthew Dawkins mentioned an interest in better python module
specified
BuildRequires dependencies on my Solaris system. It was a mess...
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541
In regard to: Re: script for BuildRequires to graphviz?, Jeff Johnson said...:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
All-
Before I re-invent the (possibly simple) wheel, I have a vague
recollection of seeing a script that can
I want
either.
I can do it myself and share if need be, but if there's prior art, I
would appreciate a pointer to it.
Thanks!
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6
, %_vendor, and potentially
other platform-related macros in your host-specific RPM macros (probably
/etc/rpm/macros).
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building
, but learning something about BDB for one of
those two packages will still help with tuning the other.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building
is/was the most important tunable (disabling sync cannot be done in production
imho).
Makes sense. Using RAM for the db env is always going to be faster than
using disk.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure
in
the log directory are additional files that are also nearly 10 MB each.
As Per suggested, you probably want to at least investigate automatic
log file removal.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure
+ line XML files just to build the
simplest package.
Maybe something like http://bee.rubyforge.org/ would keep more within
the existing YAML-ish syntax, while still allowing for a Real Language ?
Oh good. Another competing build system. ;-)
Tim
--
Tim Mooney
rpm 4.4.9, but I've been thinking about upgrading this
fall, after the initial craziness of the start of school subsides.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC
In regard to: Eliminating internal zlib., Jeff Johnson said (at 6:15pm on...:
Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4?
Yes, please.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076
they get from vendors.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building(701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jason Corley said (at 12:35pm...:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you try sign an RPM built with 3.0.x with a 4.X.Y version of RPM, the
RPM becomes corrupted.
Would this be something that's easy to fix
increasingly unreliable for communication,
I can't seem to find what I sent in the archives. Oh well ...
So support for signing ancient RPMs is a no-go, but it might be possible
to convert ancient RPMs to a more modern format?
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at 2:35pm on...:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, Jeff Johnson said (at
12:41pm...:
Could a converter be written if preserving header+payload MD5 was
not an issue? You
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building(701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
, that are still using rpm 3.0.x, have legal
restrictions on redistributing the software you've obtained from them.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building
and responsive when people have asked questions about Satellite
on the mailing list, but based on how long it's taking to get other
critical features into the product, I don't see Satellite getting this
support any time soon, if ever.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL
package.
In my experience, this happens most with perl modules and directories
under perl's site_lib.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building
$
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building(701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
was getting the os_compat chains set up. rpmrc
is no longer the way to accomplish that, but is noos packaging something
that also could be accomplished with a little support from the
community?
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services
that's the right
way to accomplish anything.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building(701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo
that a Solaris rpm client could not
access a RHEL vsftpd server.
That's correct, and there's no NAT or anything else between my workstation
and the ftp server I tried.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231
In regard to: Re: rpm 4.4.9 missing neon support in Solaris 9 - build...:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
I was using our own, which was connecting to a Red Hat Linux 4 server
running vsftpd 2.0.1. The same issue was happening for me there.
Hmm, then perhaps there is some
with bdb has that
on the table as an option. It's probably good to rethink everything
once in a while, but most projects go the opposite direction -- start
with lame-o filesystem database and move up to BDB later on.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information
not a worrier, but if I were, there are hundreds of software components
in the environment I work in that are *less* critical than Berkeley DB
that I would worry more about breaking and ruining my day (or week).
I've probably just jinxed myself, ;-)
Tim
--
Tim Mooney
whether RPM sticks
with Berkeley DB or switches to using the filesystem. If switching ends
some of the points of contention, great.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC
or lua too easily optional, those things will fall
outside of the minimal subset, and at that point one needs to decide if
it wouldn't be better to just remove the evolutionary leftovers
completely.
Just MHO,
Tim (who still has his appendix, thank you very much)
--
Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: No Neon patch..., Michael Jennings said (at 9:19pm on Jun...:
On Friday, 29 June 2007, at 14:28:46 (-0500),
Tim Mooney wrote:
I was thinking mainly of the application vendors when I replied
earlier -- companies like EMC, Oracle, IBM, etc., that want to claim
In regard to: Re: LP64 alignment issue in 4.4.9 and CVS, Jeff Johnson said...:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
rpm 4.4.9 on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 (LP64) compiled with the Sun Workshop
11 compiler gets a reproduceable SIGBUS when installing a package or
importing a key
with the
int32_t tid = iid;
but I haven't actually triggered that problem yet.
Jeff, if you need any additional information to formulate a correct fix,
let me know.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076
nearby with the
int32_t tid = iid;
but I haven't actually triggered that problem yet.
After looking at it further, I don't think int32_t tid is going
to be a problem, since it's used in a different way and not cast to (void
**).
Tim
--
Tim Mooney[EMAIL
36 matches
Mail list logo
