On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Matthew Dawkins wrote:
The question I have for both Jeff and Per, is flattening initial rpms
packages to get these needed pieces in place before and actual chroot
install begins and super unacceptable hack?
I have no idea what a 'super unacceptable hack' is as a goal
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen pkarl...@rpm5.orgwrote:
2011/1/13 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Well, I dunno at which time it might've changed, but with rpm 4.6
Requires(pre,prein,post,postun): were sorted to be
2011/1/12 Per Øyvind Karlsen pkarl...@rpm5.org:
2011/1/12 Per Øyvind Karlsen pkarl...@rpm5.org:
I've run into some ordering issues installing into a fresh chroot:
installing findutils-4.5.9-1mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
nss_tcb-1.0.6-0mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
cracklib-dicts-2.8.16-2mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
On Jan 13, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
So Id say that there's definitively something buggy going on with rpm here..
Try printing out the LOOP messages you've chosen to hide.
Then fix your LOOP's.
If claiming something buggy going on with rpm here makes you feel better,
2011/1/13 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
On Jan 13, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
So Id say that there's definitively something buggy going on with rpm here..
Try printing out the LOOP messages you've chosen to hide.
Then fix your LOOP's.
If claiming something buggy going on
2011/1/13 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
On Jan 13, 2011, at 5:29 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
But given that Requires(post) indicates that it's required at
scriptlet time, shouldn't rpm consider this as coretuilspam?
There is no scriptlet time.
There are
1) needed for installing
On Jan 13, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
2011/1/13 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
On Jan 13, 2011, at 5:29 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
But given that Requires(post) indicates that it's required at
scriptlet time, shouldn't rpm consider this as coretuilspam?
There is
On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Well, I dunno at which time it might've changed, but with rpm 4.6
Requires(pre,prein,post,postun): were sorted to be ordered before
Requires:, which is something the packaging in cooker has been heavily
relying on..
If this is true, then
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Well, I dunno at which time it might've changed, but with rpm 4.6
Requires(pre,prein,post,postun): were sorted to be ordered before
Requires:, which is something the
2011/1/13 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Well, I dunno at which time it might've changed, but with rpm 4.6
Requires(pre,prein,post,postun): were sorted to be ordered before
Requires:, which is something the packaging in cooker has been heavily
2011/1/13 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Well, I dunno at which time it might've changed, but with rpm 4.6
Requires(pre,prein,post,postun): were sorted to be ordered before
Requires:, which is something the packaging in cooker has been
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Matthew Dawkins wrote:
Per,
You know what I'd like to see is a list of the ordering done by rpm.organd
the ordering done by rpm5. In my past experience going thru and
eliminating the loops
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen pkarl...@rpm5.orgwrote:
I've run into some ordering issues installing into a fresh chroot:
installing findutils-4.5.9-1mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
nss_tcb-1.0.6-0mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
cracklib-dicts-2.8.16-2mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
2011/1/12 Per Øyvind Karlsen pkarl...@rpm5.org:
I've run into some ordering issues installing into a fresh chroot:
installing findutils-4.5.9-1mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
nss_tcb-1.0.6-0mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
cracklib-dicts-2.8.16-2mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
perl-base-5.12.2-5mdv2011.0.i586.rpm
14 matches
Mail list logo
