Re: Update brp-compress with support for xz/lzma compression

2013-08-29 Thread Matthew Dawkins
Honestly, this is kinda arrogant reply. Why deem what is appropriate based on what Fedora does? It seems that Fedora allows poor pkging if you have to fix explicit suffixes with *. What happened to have it your own way? On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote: No

Re: Update brp-compress with support for xz/lzma compression

2013-08-29 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Matthew Dawkins wrote: Honestly, this is kinda arrogant reply. Why deem what is appropriate based on what Fedora does? It seems that Fedora allows poor pkging if you have to fix explicit suffixes with *. Having dealt with various compression issues to support

Update brp-compress with support for xz/lzma compression

2013-08-26 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
This patch adds support for compressing man info pages with xz or lzma compression. -- Regards, Per Øyvind rpm-5.4.10-update-and-use-brp-compress.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Update brp-compress with support for xz/lzma compression

2013-08-26 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
No interest because already there are huge amounts of breakage making *.spec files tied to per-distro choices of what compressor to invoke. I have to fix issues like this in nearly every Fedora package I look at, to replace explicit suffixes with a glob in %files manifests. Maintain outside of