On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:48 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 3/25/22 14:47, Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> >
> > (1) There are instances when the code writes to stdout/stderr directly
> > instead via logging:
> >
> > One case at this spot:
> > https://gith
On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 13:47 +0100, Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> (2b) Somewhat related, due to the above limitation I'm setting the rpm
> log callback only just before we start working with an rpm transaction
> and lock this with a static variable lock so that the log messages
> don't get
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:48 +0100, Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm setting up rpm logging in libdnf 5 and even after setting a log
> callback function via rpmlogSetCallback(), rpm duplicates all messages
> to stdout/stderr.
>
> This is extremely impractical, c
Hello everyone,
I'm setting up rpm logging in libdnf 5 and even after setting a log
callback function via rpmlogSetCallback(), rpm duplicates all messages
to stdout/stderr.
This is extremely impractical, can something be added to the API so
that I can turn it off?
Ideally rpm shouldn't log to
Chris, apologies for the late reply.
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 13:02 -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:07 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 17:08 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
>
> > > I understand your point about auditing,
December/018662.html
> [2] http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/2021-December/018687.html
> }
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:39 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 06:16 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > (Adding the correct Daniel Mach email address
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 17:08 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> On 10. 12. 21 13:39, Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 06:16 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > (Adding the correct Daniel Mach email address, he moved from Red Hat
> > > to SUSE last month...)
> > &
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 06:16 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> (Adding the correct Daniel Mach email address, he moved from Red Hat
> to SUSE last month...)
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 10:11 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure I'm generally opposed to the idea of logs being rolled
> > back
