On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 1 December 2017 at 08:52, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>> I would prefer to apply patches to PackageKit and so on, if you will agree?
>
> Sure, as long as there are tarball releases we can depend on in
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017, at 05:48 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> We are getting requests to implement more features in microdnf,
> such as modularity[1][2], unify repo cache and overall business logic.
> Porting big portions of existing DNF code (Python) into a C library
> seems to be the only feasible
On 1 December 2017 at 08:52, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> I would prefer to apply patches to PackageKit and so on, if you will agree?
Sure, as long as there are tarball releases we can depend on in Fedora
this is fine.
Richard.
___
> Are you planning to submit patches to PackageKit for any API breakage?
> Or is the library interface as used by PK unchanged?
I would prefer to apply patches to PackageKit and so on, if you will agree?
> My main concerns boil down to two things:
>
> 1. install/builddep need to be able to