Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] RFC #417 %optional file attribute

2018-03-26 Thread Jeff Johnson
FYI: Using %config with %ghost is meaningless gibberish because there is no digest (or any content) associated with the path in the header metadata. And %optional has nothing whatsoever to do with %optional because %optional is entirely a build time directive, not a file nor a verify flag,

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] RFC #417 %optional file attribute

2018-03-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Florian Festi wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] RFC #417 %optional file attribute

2018-03-26 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Florian Festi wrote: > > Hi! > > > > We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional file > > attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections that may >

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] RFC #417 %optional file attribute

2018-03-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Florian Festi wrote: > Hi! > > We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional file > attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections that may > not be built under some circumstances (e.g. some architectures). > >

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] RFC #417 %optional file attribute

2018-03-26 Thread James Antill
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 12:43 +0200, Florian Festi wrote: > Hi! > > We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional > file attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections > that may not be built under some circumstances (e.g. some > architectures). So the normal

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Announcing DNF 3 development

2018-03-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Martin Sehnoutka wrote: > > > On 03/26/2018 01:38 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:22 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >>> On 2018-03-26, 10:52 GMT, Florian Weimer wrote: On 03/22/2018 01:40 PM, Daniel Mach wrote:

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Announcing DNF 3 development

2018-03-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:22 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2018-03-26, 10:52 GMT, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 03/22/2018 01:40 PM, Daniel Mach wrote: >>> Please read more details on our blog: >>> https://rpm-software-management.github.io/announcement/2018/03/22/dnf-3-announcement/ >>

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] RFC #417 %optional file attribute

2018-03-26 Thread Pascal Terjan
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, 11:44 Florian Festi, wrote: > Hi! > > We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional file > attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections that may > not be built under some circumstances (e.g. some architectures). > > It

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Announcing DNF 3 development

2018-03-26 Thread Florian Weimer
On 03/22/2018 01:40 PM, Daniel Mach wrote: We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating the whole software management stack. Please read more details on our blog:

[Rpm-ecosystem] RFC #417 %optional file attribute

2018-03-26 Thread Florian Festi
Hi! We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional file attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections that may not be built under some circumstances (e.g. some architectures). It is already perfectly legal to have files not listed explicitly if they are within a