On 3/12/19 10:00 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:49 AM Pat Riehecky wrote:
I've been doing a fair bit of mapping back and forth from binary rpms to
source rpms. And I had a question:
Would it make sense for a source rpm to have a generated 'Provides:' for
any %package
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:49 AM Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
> I've been doing a fair bit of mapping back and forth from binary rpms to
> source rpms. And I had a question:
>
> Would it make sense for a source rpm to have a generated 'Provides:' for
> any %package defined within the spec?
>
> For
I've been doing a fair bit of mapping back and forth from binary rpms to
source rpms. And I had a question:
Would it make sense for a source rpm to have a generated 'Provides:' for
any %package defined within the spec?
For example (actual syntax to be determined by folks smarter than
