Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:19 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Neal, > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 09:13:04PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 6:59 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:23:58PM +0100, Mark Wielaard

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 1:57 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi, > > Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:49:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > [...] > >> I'm also not comfortable with the idea of having a part of RPM itself > >> broken out and transferred to a project with subpar

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Neal, On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 09:13:04PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 6:59 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:23:58PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > The main obstacle is that tools/debugedit.c currently

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 6:59 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi, > > rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:23:58PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > The main obstacle is that tools/debugedit.c currently depends on rpm: > > > > $ git grep -h rpm tools/debugedit.c > > #include

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:23:58PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > The main obstacle is that tools/debugedit.c currently depends on rpm: > > $ git grep -h rpm tools/debugedit.c > #include > #include > if (rpmDigestLength(algorithm) == build_id_size)

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:49:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > [...] >> I'm also not comfortable with the idea of having a part of RPM itself >> broken out and transferred to a project with subpar contribution >> practices. Most of Sourceware still relies on the email

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:49:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: [...] > Splitting out from rpm would make the rpm debuginfo support a bit more > painful to support for non-Linux systems, but I guess most don't care > about that. :( Why should making debugedit either a part of elfutils or a separate

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Hi, On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:23:58PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi all, > > rpm debugedit has grown from a quick hack that simply listed/replaced > some files/strings to an almost full blown DWARF reader/writer. It is > now also used outside rpm(build). Debian packages it separately and >

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm debugedit as a separate project?

2021-02-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi all, > > rpm debugedit has grown from a quick hack that simply listed/replaced > some files/strings to an almost full blown DWARF reader/writer. It is > now also used outside rpm(build). Debian packages it separately and > Flatpak