Hi,
Since every project these days needs a todo list in the cloud I created
one for improving rpm debuginfo packages:
http://taiga.fedorainfracloud.org/project/mjw-better-rpm-debuginfo-package-creation/kanban
Various patches from Fedora have already been extended with testcases
and posted. The
Hi,
On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 11:34 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 04/27/2018 06:47 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > Here's a paste from the macros that Fedora uses
> > (/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros):
> >
> > %install %{?_enable_debug_packages:%{?buildsubdir:%{debug_package}}}\
> > %%install\
>
Hi Panu,
I added debuge...@sourceware.org to the CC.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:52:53PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 3/23/21 2:29 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 3/22/21 7:42 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > There is a test debugedit-0.1 release to see whether this works.
Hi,
As discussed I setup a separate debugedit project:
https://sourceware.org/debugedit/
It contains the debugedit and sepdebugcrcfix programs and the find-
debuginfo.sh script and the debugedit.at testsuite. I used git-filter-
repo to keep the git history of the files from the rpm repo. Then I
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:53:43AM +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> However, a better alternative would be for flatpak to consume the
> upstream version as a git submodule (that gets dist:ed with the
> tarball). That is what flatpak does with some other external
> dependencies. Sometimes it
Hi,
Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:49:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm also not comfortable with the idea of having a part of RPM itself
>> broken out and transferred to a project with subpar contribution
>> practices. Most of Sourceware still relies on the email
Hi,
rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:23:58PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The main obstacle is that tools/debugedit.c currently depends on rpm:
>
> $ git grep -h rpm tools/debugedit.c
> #include
> #include
> if (rpmDigestLength(algori
Hi Neal,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 09:13:04PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 6:59 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:23:58PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > The main obstacle is that
Hi all,
rpm debugedit has grown from a quick hack that simply listed/replaced
some files/strings to an almost full blown DWARF reader/writer. It is
now also used outside rpm(build). Debian packages it separately and
Flatpak builder has an embedded copy it uses to post-process debuginfo.
It is
Hi,
Adding the debugedit list to the CC because that project maintains the
find-debuginfo script now: https://sourceware.org/debugedit/
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 08:09:08PM +0800, abstrakta wrote:
> I'm building some rpm packages from cross compiled binaries.
> My build system is x86_64.I want to
10 matches
Mail list logo
