On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:42 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
>
> Chris, apologies for the late reply.
>
> On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 13:02 -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:07 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 17:08 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> >
> > > > I
Chris, apologies for the late reply.
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 13:02 -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:07 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 17:08 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
>
> > > I understand your point about auditing, but does DNF have to handle
> > >
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Colin Walters:
> [...]
>> What I *did* wake up one day and say I'm going to do is make upgrades
>> transactional and offline by default and hence safe. No one should
>> ever fear starting an operating system upgrade while their laptop is
>> at 30% battery.
* Colin Walters:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, at 5:34 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Chris Murphy:
>>
>>> Fedora 36 seems like a good time to do this. What do you think?
>>
>> It's a bit odd to locate a database under /usr that isn't pre-built and
>> installed.
>
> Why is that odd?
Mentally, I
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, at 5:34 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Chris Murphy:
>
>> Fedora 36 seems like a good time to do this. What do you think?
>
> It's a bit odd to locate a database under /usr that isn't pre-built and
> installed.
Why is that odd?
> I guess in theory there could be
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:09 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 13:53 -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > For my non-emphemeral systems:
> >
> > * /usr /var /etc are directories contained in btrfs subvolume
> > "root-x86-64:fedora.35"
> > * read-only snapshots have an ISO 8601 datetime
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:07 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 17:08 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > I understand your point about auditing, but does DNF have to handle
> > everything?
> > There should be better options of tracking filesystem rollbacks than
> > DNF's history
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 13:53 -0500, Chris Murphy wrote:
> {
> Apologies for not sending to rpm-ecosystem@ first off [1], then b.
> since I wasn't subscribed to rpm-ecosystem@ my reply [2] was dropped,
> messing up the threading.
> [1]
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 17:08 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> On 10. 12. 21 13:39, Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 06:16 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > (Adding the correct Daniel Mach email address, he moved from Red Hat
> > > to SUSE last month...)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at
{
Apologies for not sending to rpm-ecosystem@ first off [1], then b.
since I wasn't subscribed to rpm-ecosystem@ my reply [2] was dropped,
messing up the threading.
[1] http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/2021-December/018662.html
[2]
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 06:16 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> (Adding the correct Daniel Mach email address, he moved from Red Hat
> to SUSE last month...)
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 10:11 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure I'm generally opposed to the idea of logs being rolled
> > back
(Adding the correct Daniel Mach email address, he moved from Red Hat
to SUSE last month...)
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 10:11 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 5:01 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> >
> > Hello Chris,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 5:01 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 9:05 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 12/7/21 06:00, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Hi RPM and DNF folks,
> >
> > I have a draft change proposal for review and comment, i.e. it's not yet
> > set to be published to Fedora devel@. It's a bit thin, but I expect to
> > fill in more
13 matches
Mail list logo
