Dne 24.7.2018 v 20:41 Jeff Johnson napsal(a):
>
>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> I would have use for %optional:
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/scl-utils/pull-request/1
>>
>> Let me explain. scl-utils 2.x introduced support for environment
>> modules. They are
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I would have use for %optional:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/scl-utils/pull-request/1
>
> Let me explain. scl-utils 2.x introduced support for environment
> modules. They are now enforcing existence of modulefile. However, the
>
I would have use for %optional:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/scl-utils/pull-request/1
Let me explain. scl-utils 2.x introduced support for environment
modules. They are now enforcing existence of modulefile. However, the
modulefile is not available in SCLs prepared for scl-utils 1.x and
FYI: Using %config with %ghost is meaningless gibberish because there is no
digest (or any content) associated with the path in the header metadata.
And %optional has nothing whatsoever to do with %optional because %optional is
entirely a build time directive, not a file nor a verify flag,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Florian Festi wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Florian Festi wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional file
> > attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections that may
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Florian Festi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional file
> attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections that may
> not be built under some circumstances (e.g. some architectures).
>
>
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 12:43 +0200, Florian Festi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional
> file attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections
> that may not be built under some circumstances (e.g. some
> architectures).
So the normal
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, 11:44 Florian Festi, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional file
> attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections that may
> not be built under some circumstances (e.g. some architectures).
>
> It
Hi!
We are currently pondering about #417 [1]. For adding a %optional file
attribute that would allow adding file to to %files sections that may
not be built under some circumstances (e.g. some architectures).
It is already perfectly legal to have files not listed explicitly if
they are within a
10 matches
Mail list logo