Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2016-10-18 Thread Florian Festi
On 10/18/2016 05:23 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > Can a link to http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/BooleanDependencies be > added to > http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies ? Good point. Done! Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2016-10-18 Thread Pat Riehecky
Can a link to http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/BooleanDependencies be added to http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies ? Pat On 08/25/2015 07:11 AM, Florian Festi wrote: Hi! I have been visiting Michael Schröder discussing the syntax for the rich deps [1]. There are still a few

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2015-09-01 Thread Florian Festi
On 09/01/2015 02:20 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Florian Festi >wrote: > > My thought after the discussion so far: > > May be no one really cares about the syntax. > Still a lot of educating to do before rich

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2015-09-01 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:54:03AM +0200, Florian Festi wrote: > Libsolv - the currently only dependency solver with rich deps support - > does not order the "or" terms but instead tries to pick the "best" of > all packages - no matter of the order within the dependency. > > While we have

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2015-08-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Florian Festi wrote: > My thought after the discussion so far: > > May be no one really cares about the syntax. > Still a lot of educating to do before rich deps go into production. > > > On 08/25/2015 02:11 PM, Florian Festi wrote: > > > IF

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2015-08-31 Thread Florian Festi
My thought after the discussion so far: May be no one really cares about the syntax. Still a lot of educating to do before rich deps go into production. On 08/25/2015 02:11 PM, Florian Festi wrote: > IF Operator Guess we stay with (. IF . ELSE .) - even some people are more familiar with (. ?

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2015-08-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 26 August 2015 at 20:13, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote: Dne 25.8.2015 v 17:16 Florian Festi napsal(a): On 08/25/2015 02:50 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: I read it as install foo-lang-es in case langsupport-es is installed. This is quite common construct, but I really don't understand the

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2015-08-26 Thread James Antill
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 10:29 +0200, Florian Festi wrote: On 08/25/2015 06:12 PM, Pavel Odvody wrote: On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 18:01 +0200, Florian Festi wrote: Well, as Requires are (logically) all connected with an AND this is equivalent to: Requires: PkgA Requires: (PkgB IF NOT PkgC)

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Rich deps syntax finalization

2015-08-26 Thread Florian Festi
On 08/26/2015 02:58 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 26.8.2015 v 14:00 Florian Festi napsal(a): On 08/26/2015 10:47 AM, Florian Festi wrote: Right now libsolv does not distinguish between different orders of the operands. But we have already discussed making the OR operator preferring the left most