Quoting Andreas Gruenbacher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello all,
I am trying to get the minimal bits and pieces into place for allowing us to
start using file capabilties.
Currently, rpm neither supports acls nor file capabilities [1], and so when
they are needed, the usual way is to set
Hi Florian,
thanks a lot for your reply. Some short remarks/questions inline.
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:20:24 +0200
Florian Festi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I am currently working on the scalability issues in rpm.
Very good and good luck! We are intested in testing.
The filename does not affect the contents of the RPM package.
So if you set the version to 1, the release to 1. And then name filename:
foo-2-300.bar.rpm
RPM is going to install the package using a version of 1 and a release of 1.
On many systems, the filename is truncated to be simply
Hi,
I'm very often using constructs that create a macro that is later
expanding before %install defining several subpackages (like the
debuginfo packages do). This worked for all version of rpm as far back
as RHL8, but breaks now with F10.
The simplified construct is as follows:
Some macro file
