On 08/27/2013 08:18 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Heading and comments says it all: For some reason the check attribute
corresponding to the %check section is missing from the python
interface. Patch below have been tested and works OK.
Hi,
Looks like just an ancient oversight to not include the
On 08/23/2013 06:13 PM, Victor Secarin wrote:
Hello, all:
Is it possible to have a scriptlet access the stored scriptlets of another,
already installed, package?
During upgrade, I understand the old preun/postun will run after the new
pre/post. That should mean the new package has a chance
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:41:42PM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
Hi Panu al,
the attached patch cleans up the code in digest_beecrypt:
[...]
- rc = pgpMpiSet(qbits, sig-data, p, pend);
+ rc = pgpMpiSet(qbits, sig-data);
Deleted p parameter by mistake.
[...]
-for
On 08/28/2013 11:18 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:41:42PM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
Hi Panu al,
the attached patch cleans up the code in digest_beecrypt:
[...]
- rc = pgpMpiSet(qbits, sig-data, p, pend);
+ rc = pgpMpiSet(qbits, sig-data);
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:39:35PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
No objections to the changes as such, but please split the patch up a bit:
at the very least separate the interface change from the beecrypt-cleanups,
but I wouldn't mind the beecrypt cleanups further split up either. That bit
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:52:48PM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:39:35PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
No objections to the changes as such, but please split the patch up a bit:
at the very least separate the interface change from the beecrypt-cleanups,
but I
On 08/28/2013 08:11 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:52:48PM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:39:35PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
No objections to the changes as such, but
