Force-pushed with a new version. New function is called `posix.redirect2null`
and takes fd number as argument:
```
posix.redirect2null(1) # close stdout
posix.redirect2null(2) # close stderr
```
I run a few package installs/uninstalls with different scriptlets using this,
and all seems to wor
http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-ecosystem/
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/37#issuecomment-192447174___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mail
This needs to be rebased and cleaned up to go though a second round of review.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#issuecomment-192313529___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.
Closing. See #38 for reasoning.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/38#issuecomment-192313053___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/r
Closed #38.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/38#event-577884246___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Closed #37.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/37#event-577883375___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Looks like those macros are being used to build some packages and just removing
them is probably not an option for now. Still I think you have a very valid
point in that the macros are a mess and deserve cleaning up. See rpm-ecosystem
ML for a broader discussion on the topic.
Closing.
---
Repl
