Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

@rpm-maint Please hate @jsilhan and @j-mracek for this -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/109#issuecomment-266035398___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

For those looking from GitHub and the URL is being weirdly borked, here's the bug: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9832 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

On 9 December 2016 at 15:41, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > @soig Fully agree, saw same problem in Fedora > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

@proyvind @soig @ignatenkobrain Maybe it'd be better if it was not on by default? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

@soig Fully agree, saw same problem in Fedora -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/109#issuecomment-266029269___

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

On 9 December 2016 at 04:03, proyvind wrote: > …ault > > The legacy mandriva %apply_patches macro by default generated backup > files with unique suffixes by default, the suffix for patch0 being > .0001~ etc. > > As for those of us still using gendiff, this is still

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

Can one of the admins verify this patch? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/109#issuecomment-266029013___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Metatags (#107)

I'm a bit confused. What exactly are MetaTags supposed to do? You mention comps, are these supposed to be more like [SUSE's patterns](https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/system:install:head/patterns-openSUSE/patterns-openSUSE.spec?expand=1)? I can't quite tell what this is supposed to

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. Looks good to me. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Link testing/usr/bin to testing/bin.

Some tests running under fakechroot started failing because scripts tried to execute /usr/bin/rm but inside the testing chroot /usr/bin and /bin aren't linked. Just symlink testing/usr/bin to testing/bin to simulate a unified /usr setup. Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard ---

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Build fixes related to (#108)

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:57:50PM -0800, DNF Bot wrote: > Can one of the admins verify this patch? Could you please include the patch you want to see verified in your message? Thanks, Mark ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

[Rpm-maint] Unable to build after Stop messing with CFLAGS from configure patch

Hi, commit bd3eb213 "Stop messing with CFLAGS from configure" renamed rpm.am to rpm.am.in. rpm.am is included am into all Makefile.am files. But rpm.am is now generated by configure. Which means it is generated in the builddir so the includes should reference top_builddir instead of top_srcdir

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Build fixes related to (#108)

Closed #108. -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/108#event-888031777___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org