More followup, just a FYI. Note that in this PR the whole of
/usr/lib/sysimage is just usr_t:
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib/pull/43
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
Updated :arrow_up: to use your suggestion - though can you help me understand:
what's the difference between "RPM" and "its source code"? Documentation?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
It just feels odd to me that the behavior of a file with just one macro is
different than a file with two macros. But don't mind me ;)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
If all definitions fail then the perhaps it's a misplaced file, or otherwise
something totally bogus. But if just one of many fails then that's more likely
a typo/thinko kind of error. I thought that was fairly obvious. To turn the
question around: why not?
--
You are receiving this because
That "return an error if all definitions fail" is pretty weird. What's the
rationale for that?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
The rewording makes it look like the license is ONLY about the source when that
certainly is not the case, NAK for that part. You need to be really, really
careful when messing with license texts...
Either just fix the spelling to use "its" or drop the unnecessary mumbling
about the source, ie
