Re: [Rpm-maint] RFC: RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation

2018-04-01 Thread Vladimir D. Seleznev
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 07:50:09AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev > wrote: > > Hello, rpm-maint@! > > > > There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation. > > > > The main idea is that RPMTAG_IDENTITY

Re: [Rpm-maint] RFC: RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation

2018-04-01 Thread Vladimir D. Seleznev
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:07:21PM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > > > On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev > > wrote: > > > > Hello, rpm-maint@! > > > > There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation. > > > > The main idea is that

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] IDENTITY as header tag extension discussion (#426)

2018-04-01 Thread wladmis
There was a suggestion to [calculate RPMTAG_IDENTITY as tag extension](http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/2018-March/007688.html) and do not the tag to actual rpm package during build time. The main idea is to take message digest from package header tags filtered by the blacklist

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

2018-04-01 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/425#pullrequestreview-108512134___

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

2018-04-01 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
Conan-Kudo requested changes on this pull request. Small suggestions. > @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ optflags: armv6hl -O2 -g -march=armv6 -mfloat-abi=hard > -mfpu=vfp optflags: armv7l -O2 -g -march=armv7 optflags: armv7hl -O2 -g -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 optflags: armv7hnl -O2 -g

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

2018-04-01 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. Looks good to me! Nice job!  -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

2018-04-01 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
According to http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.den0024a/CJHECGIH.html, "Both floating-point and NEON are required in all standard ARMv8 implementations", but "implementations targeting specialized markets may support the following combinations: No NEON or

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

2018-04-01 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
Conan-Kudo commented on this pull request. > @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ optflags: armv6hl -O2 -g -march=armv6 -mfloat-abi=hard > -mfpu=vfp optflags: armv7l -O2 -g -march=armv7 optflags: armv7hl -O2 -g -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 optflags: armv7hnl -O2 -g -march=armv7-a