Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE/RFC Add support for %{md: } (#584)

2018-11-07 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
I don't prefer asciidoc, I think markdown is fine, but I just don't know why anything special is needed for it... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/584#issu

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Handle DistTag (#594)

2018-11-07 Thread wladmis
Related to #589. I'm not sure, but if it is OK, there can be a new feature to handle `DistTag` (named `rpmlib(HandleDistTag)`, for example) that is required if there is non-empty `DistTag` while package is building. Something like: +++ build/pack.c (in proper place): /* if DistTag is n

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE/RFC Add support for %{md: } (#584)

2018-11-07 Thread nim-nim
But anyway, it could be done with asciidoc syntax if you prefer. I don't care much as long as paragraph breaks, lists, and probably bold and italic are unambiguously specified and can be converted to other formats without brittle heuristics. And probably support stripping of ` from descriptyion