[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add %__autoreconf macro (#688)

2019-05-01 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
This macro still is missing in whole set of auto tools macros. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/688 -- Commit Summary -- * Add %__autoreconf macro -- File Changes -- M macros.in (1) -- Patch Links -- h

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: provide a mecanism to store buildroot composition in the srpm or a specific subpackage (#607)

2019-05-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 12:56:39AM -0700, nim-nim wrote: > It turns out that even an historic package like elfutils has to hack this in > `%check` because it's not done by default. I was wondering what this was referring to and I think you mean: %check # Record some build root versions in build.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Make check-buildroot check the build files in parallel (#687)

2019-05-01 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
Conan-Kudo commented on this pull request. > find "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" \! \( \ -name '*.pyo' -o -name '*.pyc' -o -name '*.elc' -o -name '.packlist' \ \) -type f -print0 | \ -LANG=C xargs -0r grep -F "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" >$tmp +LANG=C xargs -0r -P$NCPUS -n16 grep -F "$RPM_BUILD_ROO

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: provide a mecanism to store buildroot composition in the srpm or a specific subpackage (#607)

2019-05-01 Thread nim-nim
It turns out that even an historic package like elfutils has to hack this in `%check` because it's not done by default. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/60