@DemiMarie pushed 1 commit.
678a8986de95b945c70508054d844d11b41f1bd8 Tag data must have count greater than
zero
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@DemiMarie pushed 1 commit.
3ce3e85d61caae81d94afcff6afa5046bc2d5f65 Use int64_t for lengths
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@DemiMarie pushed 1 commit.
a136f9d70f207c7b75e47a05f0f2aabe612c874e Tag data must have count greater than
zero
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
"int" is (at least) 32 bits on all platforms rpm supports, that's not an issue.
The rough idea is that explicitly sized types are used for "physical" data of
that size, and abstract types for abstractions, such as results of calculation.
In fact this (and various other similar places) would
Merged #1432 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1432#event-4222151859___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closed #1089 via #1508.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1089#event-4221981517___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Merged #1508 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1508#event-4221981506___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Clarified the erasure behavior, documented it for pretrans and posttrans too,
plus some formatting added.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit.
b8ac6a43dc78d47fc52770d2cfe920189ff888f7 Document dependency qualifiers (#1089)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit.
7864289532949e4e426245b831803ae8d6aaa7ae Document dependency qualifiers (#1089)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
Oh, right, I'd forgotten about that. That existing check is wrong in it's
current habitat, it got moved around in the last big refactoring. A header is
fundamentally nothing but an abstract data container, and being empty is an
entirely valid condition for it to be in.
--
You are receiving
Merged #1498 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1498#event-4221638147___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Thanks for the patch!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1498#issuecomment-762728268___
Rpm-maint mailing list
%preun and %postun qualifiers also prevent removal, as does %verify, and maybe
something else too.
We should actually make meta combined with any order-relevant qualifier an
error...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Header entry count is an unsigned integer, there cannot be any negative entries.
There's a reason I told you to only check against zero and nothing else ;)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Merged #1510 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1510#event-4221483889___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closed #1091 via #1510.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1091#event-4221483899___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@pmatilai approved this pull request.
I would've initialized the "output" variable to NULL on declaration but it's
not an actual issue in the code (it always gets initialized anyway), just a
belt-and-suspenders thing.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
/me notes that we have the same exact bug in the xz code (this is on zstd, not
xz as the commit says) #1478 and sighs.
We have three places that do this kind of parsing, we should only have one. Any
takers? :innocent:
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Looks good over all. May be there should be a more explicit emphasis that no
qualifier (other than `meta`) is the "strongest" dependency as it does not
allow the package to be removed. The only way to combine this with other
qualifiers is to have two separate dependency statements.
--
You are
Nice catch!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1509#issuecomment-762702723___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Merged #1509 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1509#event-4221436905___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@ffesti pushed 3 commits.
b7b472b3e4ff284e260a581749c6fb30f24f38cc Parse spec snippets before running
%check
3e4d486e415f603b2403eae7faa8a5325eedf39e Use __rpmbuild_*.specpart in BUILDDIR
instead of __rpm sub dir
ce3c6e97be69c6febcd3fd2f6424099eb8e7bdd2 Add support for
23 matches
Mail list logo
