[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmsign: support EdDSA signatures (#1571)

They were previously rejected You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1571 -- Commit Summary -- * rpmsign: support EdDSA signatures -- File Changes -- M sign/rpmgensig.c (1) -- Patch Links --

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPMv6 proposal: require tag data entries in package headers (both main and signature) to be sorted (#1555)

How will this interact with signature headers that are not in a contiguous region? My personal preference is to require signature headers to be contiguous in RPMv6, and not doing so seems to interact poorly with this proposal. That said, you did NAK my earlier suggestion to that effect. --

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: use fingerprints instead of key IDs internally (#1549)

At the very least we can check the fingerprint of a public key against those of its signatures. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmsign cannot use Ed25519 keys (#1565)

Can we just use `RPMSIGTAG_RSAHEADER`? Tools like DNF and libdnf will be confused by a new tag number, and RPM itself doesn’t care. DSA is largely deprecated by now anyway. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: