Yes, the bug in the rpmlint was fixed. For now the `%{load:foo}` is used in
`ruby.spec` on the Fedora rawhide (development version) branch instead of
`%{?load:foo}`.
We are asking here to understand more about the details and context.
* "If I am not mistaken, at that time, the question mark
Isn't the bug in rpmlint that broke using %{load:} fixed with
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/pull/633 ?
I.e. you can now simply use `%{load:}` instead of the undocumented `%{?load:}`,
right?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
My guess is that it is wrongly assumed that the size of a symbolic link equals
the length of the path that the symbolic link points to.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
