You’re welcome. What about padding between one tag and the next?
Personally, I think that using a dribble for the padding is a fine, _provided_
that:
1. No other tags are allowed in the dribble.
2. Regions are checked to be consistent.
3. The padding is _required_ to be in the dribble.
4. The
No problem. I just didn't know if I should subscribe to a list like the old rpm
list. I can track this ticket.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-5087569
You are receiving this because you are
Closed #2383 as completed via #2388.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2383#event-8590664390
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Merged #2388 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2388#event-8590664143
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint
Seems as simple as it's going to get :laughing:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2388#issuecomment-1441616478
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
How about this one?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2388#issuecomment-1441612623
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint
@dmnks pushed 1 commit.
ec34dba06c97d2b17263c91fc7af43f45f050271 Don't repeat %patchN deprecation
warning
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2388/files/37c84fae30c7a5a2985e2a50f090a0e5ab8f68c6..ec34dba06c97d2b17263c91fc7af43f45f050271
You are receiving
I'm all for properly supporting multi-arch in packages (the multiarch deps are
even mentioned in the v6 spec here), but getting rid of "arch" is likely to be,
uh, complicated. Even if rpm itself could, the repodata and every single
depsolver out there has very deeply wired assumptions about
I was about to say that checking for those zeros seems more a matter of
implementing as the spec already requires it, BUT. I'm moderately surprised ..
scratch that, shocked that the padding between the signature and main header is
not even *mentioned* in the LSB
