@dmnks There is a FUSE implementation of OverlayFS that also supports the BSDs.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2559#issuecomment-165921
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
> At that point, adding a legacy backend using fakechroot (or just chroot
> perhaps) would be a possibility and while I won't make any promises, I
> _might_ look at that later.
Hmm, I totally forgot that `chroot` alone wouldn't suffice, the system would
also need to have something like
If a query is run specifying a non existent dbpath, rpm implictly creates a db
directory and db files at the specified location.
For example:
```
mkdir t
cd t
rpm -q rpm --dbpath $PWD/t
```
The above commands result in:
```
root@ph5dev:~ # mkdir t
mkdir: created directory 't'
root@ph5dev:~ # cd
@Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2571#pullrequestreview-1526434141
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
@NattyNarwhal pushed 1 commit.
cd8878d51fc1d8dc177bed2a4e622eb07570a91c Cast to fix constiness checks
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2571/files/56831f16ff2588bc61c9a252fb3157f5246c47f7..cd8878d51fc1d8dc177bed2a4e622eb07570a91c
You are receiving this
That's weird, `basename(3)` should take a `char*`, not `const char*`, per the
glibc and macOS man page.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2571#issuecomment-163278
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to
Anyway, the timing of your question was just right as I had been contemplating
just about the same thing, i.e. whether to decouple the test suite *completely*
from the sandboxing method used or make bwrap hardwired. (It's also one of the
reasons this PR is *still* not merged, sigh.)
This is a
> Oh, so you do have a fakechroot build (in that VM) that works fine with the
> test suite, correct?
Nah, disregard that, you just confirmed that in your reply:
> but [fakeroot](https://salsa.debian.org/clint/fakeroot) is supposed to work
> on macOS and is [available via
>
Oh, so you do have a fakechroot build (in that VM) that works fine with the
test suite, correct?
I mean, it's not a huge program with a lot of dependencies anyway (and
`chroot()`, which AFAIK is used underneath, is a POSIX function, as you said),
so it's probably easier to port than a full
I have a virtual machine with macOS that I do destructive things in.
Occasionally that includes running the test suite, but even just making a build
environment for RPM in macOS manually (and avoiding homebrew) is pretty messy,
so I do all that work in a dedicated virtual machine.
--
Reply to
> Darwin has `chroot()` like all POSIX systems. I'm not sure if `fakechroot`
> works on Darwin, but [`fakeroot`](https://salsa.debian.org/clint/fakeroot) is
> supposed to work on macOS and is [available via
> homebrew](https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/fakeroot).
>
> Darwin also has the sandbox
Since I already started describing the new architecture, here's a perhaps
simpler outline of how it works now (`mktree` is wired into the `make`):
1) `mktree build`
* builds a base OS tree
* builds RPM natively and make installs it into the base OS tree
2) `mktree check`
* runs `rpmtests`
Darwin has `chroot()` like all POSIX systems. I'm not sure if `fakechroot`
works on Darwin, but [`fakeroot`](https://salsa.debian.org/clint/fakeroot) is
supposed to work on macOS and is [available via
homebrew](https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/fakeroot).
Darwin also has the sandbox API (which
Bubblewrap (bwrap) is used here to create fast, ephemeral per-test containers
(*snapshots*) of the root filesystem. This replaces the former use of
fakechroot. The whole test suite (the `rpmtests` script) assumes that the RPM
build to be tested is installed into the root filesystem.
That
Yocto will probably wind up using this too, since they support the RPM stack
with architectures like this.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2540#issuecomment-1632250845
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to
What do we do if we want to run the test suite on non-Linux? Like macOS?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2559#issuecomment-1632247013
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
@Conan-Kudo requested changes on this pull request.
Looks like this isn't working exactly:
>From CI:
```
[ 73%] Building C object CMakeFiles/rpmuncompress.dir/tools/rpmuncompress.c.o
/srv/rpm/tools/rpmuncompress.c: In function 'doUntar':
/srv/rpm/tools/rpmuncompress.c:101:39: error: passing
@Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2571#pullrequestreview-1526020644
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
18 matches
Mail list logo
