xref https://github.com/containers/storage/pull/1608
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2637#issuecomment-1699140774
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Not all filesystems support everything rpm does, and sometimes features are
intentionally disabled by mount options. Currently these are failing in the
middle of the transaction with varying degrees of collateral damage. Rpm should
probe filesystems at the preparing stage to check if they suppor
Requirement for generators to output all filenames whether they have
dependencies or not eliminated now, preserving the order otherwise is still
required. That can be added later if deemed necessary, but there's no point to
cause a useful feature to get stuck on that so lifting the draft status.
@pmatilai pushed 7 commits.
966b6dfbe58df2d0cac1d9d3530551a440139241 Refactor file walk loop into
rpmfcHelper()
83ac34f99394fea8654c7b918f916928f1d29327 Pass the entire attribute to
applyAttr() for more flexibility
d6c2cc5cf9f09a446c3c913076cdad1fc993b028 Split weeding out excludes to a
sepa
Closed #2451.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2451#event-10229613682
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm
So the moral of the story here is that it's much more complicated than this
naive attempt. Back to the drawing board, to be revisited some day.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2451#issuecomment-1698663119
You are receiving
The PR has lots of valuable input from @mlschroe , but the executive summary is
that the world is now a much more complicated place than when the initial
requests for this feature was filed (in the ballpark of the turn of the
millenium), thanks to rich dependencies in particular.
This goes bac
