Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Standardize on OCI images for test-suite, even locally (Issue #2643)

2023-09-05 Thread Michal Domonkos
Ack, it's a confirmed *bug* now and will be dealt with like any other. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2643#issuecomment-1706551024 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Standardize on OCI images for test-suite, even locally (Issue #2643)

2023-09-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
Yep, to me that'd be among the top issues to address. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2643#issuecomment-1706548969 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Standardize on OCI images for test-suite, even locally (Issue #2643)

2023-09-05 Thread Michal Domonkos
Yup, just the fact that we currently have *two* distinct ways to create a test image is awkward and just attracts all kinds of bugs :laughing: -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2643#issuecomment-1706543839 You are

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Standardize on OCI images for test-suite, even locally (Issue #2643)

2023-09-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
> So, to summarize, the goal of this ticket is to merge mktree.fedora and > mktree.podman such that a host-specific Dockerfile. is used to build > the image, instead of a mktree. script that does that from scratch. > It also has to support reusing the local build artifacts for local >

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support generating dependencies for multiple files at once (PR #2537)

2023-09-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
Merged #2537 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2537#event-10282462538 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Move checks and package initialization after build (PR #2646)

2023-09-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
@pmatilai requested changes on this pull request. Eek. I can see why you want to do something like this, but this kind of mega-patch that is hard to review and totally unbisectable. Split it into more commits. For things that just move but don't actually change, temporarily change them to

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Move checks and package initialization after build (PR #2646)

2023-09-05 Thread Florian Festi
as far as possible. This allows setting these tags during the build using the dynamic spec feature. Move copyTagsDuringParse requiredTags optionalTags isMemberInEntry() checkForValidArchitectures() checkForRequired() checkForDuplicates() fillOutMainPackage() copyInheritedTags() from

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] SPECPARTS dir in %_builddir/%buildsubdir is leaking to setuptools package discovery (Issue #2532)

2023-09-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
That assumes `%{_builddir}/%{name}*` has a meaning to begin with. Any package making assumptions about has already stepped outside its boundaries. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2532#issuecomment-1706032257 You are

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Drop no longer needed pull from updates-testing for rpm-sequoia (PR #2642)

2023-09-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
Merged #2642 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2642#event-10279455658 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint