Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Remove the internal OpenPGP parser (Issue #2414)

2023-11-24 Thread Alexander Kanavin
> > We can live with rpm verification disabled too. > > This is a terrible idea from a security perspective. In embedded linux world, production systems are rarely if ever updated from package feeds by a package manager. Rather, the whole root filesystem gets overwritten from an image file.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Remove the internal OpenPGP parser (Issue #2414)

2023-11-24 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
> So outsourcing the crypto to external gpg executable would be very welcome. This isn’t going to happen because spawning an external program breaks in too many situations. > We can live with rpm verification disabled too. This is a terrible idea from a security perspective. -- Reply to this

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Remove the internal OpenPGP parser (Issue #2414)

2023-11-24 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Just wanted to add the Yocto perspective: we don't have anything against sequoia, except its build dependencies. It needs both rust and clang (via one of the crates), rust and cland are both extremely heavy items to build, and we can't inject them into the core build sequence because it would