> You can get the list of files with rpm -q --qf='[%{FILENAMES}\n]'. There is
> nothing dirty about that, those are the building blocks.
So, for what `rpm -ql` ?
And, as example same behaviour of `ls` (Why you have OWN WAY and why this
solution right?):
```Bash
$ mkdir empty_dir
$ cd
> I don't see that this is the rpm binary's issue
I completely disagree with this imprisonment.
You (or your team ) made strange, unpopular decision that makes problems for
simple (popular, expected) case. Other software put this warning to stderr or
just return nothing with success code.
You
