Closed #1719.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1719#event-4922937009___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Resolved through #1721
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1719#issuecomment-866006156___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rebased. Is it looking better?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1721#issuecomment-865896027___
Rpm-maint mailing
Related: #1719
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1721
-- Commit Summary --
* Allow /usr/libexec/* rpaths
-- File Changes --
M scripts/check-rpaths-worker (2)
-- Patch Links --
Updated the comment. It seems the optimizations do indeed work from my local
testing.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
kernel result on koji with the current version on rawhide:
```
real13m51.517s
user8m53.216s
sys 7m34.105s
```
kernel results locally with the patch:
```
real1m10.202s
user8m19.161s
sys 5m6.297s
```
For completion I'll also try it locally without the patch.
--
You are
> Yeah, I figured this would help, but it took your message for me to see how
> to do that in an clean and easy way.
>
> Can someone test the changes, please. May be even with one of the long
> running builds like kernel.
I'm doing some local initial testing.
--
You are receiving this
Maybe a bug here? Or an explicit policy check? Those directories seem that they
should be allowed. Examples:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1969310
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973304
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
Proposed also from the mailing list to speedup things:
-check_rpath $i "RPATH"
-check_rpath $i "RUNPATH"
+check_rpath $i "RPATH|RUNPATH"
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Hello,
I've recently implemented this change for Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Broken_RPATH_will_fail_rpmbuild
Basically the check-rpaths-worker is running as a buildroot policy script as of
F35. Unfortunately after the implementation of the change, some packages saw an
10 matches
Mail list logo