Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] RFC: Allow for disabling Berkeley DB support

2017-06-30 Thread Darren Hart
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:57:05AM +0100, Neal Gompa wrote: ... > My suggestion is to assume enabled (unless dependencies can't be > satisfied) if not specified to be disabled. If specified to be enabled > and dependencies not satisfied, throw an error. > I did not want to change the default

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] RFC: Allow for disabling Berkeley DB support

2017-06-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:33:46AM +0100, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Darren Hart (VMware) >> wrote: >> > Introduce a --disable-bdb configuration option which disables

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] RFC: Allow for disabling Berkeley DB support

2017-06-29 Thread Darren Hart
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:33:46AM +0100, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Darren Hart (VMware) > wrote: > > Introduce a --disable-bdb configuration option which disables the use of > > Berkeley DB entirely. Update the various autotools to ensure that at

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] RFC: Allow for disabling Berkeley DB support

2017-06-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Darren Hart (VMware) wrote: > Introduce a --disable-bdb configuration option which disables the use of > Berkeley DB entirely. Update the various autotools to ensure that at > least one of BDB or NDB is enabled. Existing configuration

[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] RFC: Allow for disabling Berkeley DB support

2017-06-22 Thread Darren Hart (VMware)
Introduce a --disable-bdb configuration option which disables the use of Berkeley DB entirely. Update the various autotools to ensure that at least one of BDB or NDB is enabled. Existing configuration options continue as before. Minor updates to dbi.h and dbi.c to handle bdb being optional. Add a