Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

2016-05-30 Thread Florian Weimer
On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes in a spec file. Would you please merge the patch? I think I brought forth valid use cases which break as a res

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

2016-03-01 Thread Florian Weimer
On 03/01/2016 04:07 PM, Florian Festi wrote: > On 03/01/2016 03:51 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:29:41PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: >>> On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to build pac

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

2016-03-01 Thread Florian Festi
On 03/01/2016 03:51 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:29:41PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: >> On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to >>> build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

2016-03-01 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:29:41PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: > On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to > > build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes > > in a spec file. > > Would it be suffic

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

2016-03-01 Thread Florian Festi
On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to > build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes > in a spec file. Would it be sufficient for your use case to change the anti-cheating Requires to something ot

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

2016-03-01 Thread Florian Weimer
On 03/01/2016 11:42 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:53:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to >> build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes >> in a spec file. > > What do you mean

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

2016-03-01 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:53:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to > build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes > in a spec file. What do you mean by "in the way"? The protection was added for a reason...

[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

2016-02-29 Thread Florian Weimer
This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes in a spec file. diff --git a/build/build.c b/build/build.c index 04b039c..1bcc436 100644 --- a/build/build.c +++ b/build/build.c @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static rpmRC