On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 07:44:21AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Hmm, right. Care to whip up an updated patch that does what you described?
The patch is in my other mail about psm.c.
> And adding an error message wouldn't hurt either :)
Well, that's deep in psm.c. What happens is that stage P
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:00:16AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Please do. I'm not claiming you're not right, seeing the problem would
help *me* understand it properly :)
Say you have Jeff's rpmHeadersIdentical() in depend.cs. If you
have two pack
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:00:16AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Please do. I'm not claiming you're not right, seeing the problem would
> help *me* understand it properly :)
Say you have Jeff's rpmHeadersIdentical() in depend.cs. If you
have two packages with same NEVR but different PKGIDs, the
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:08:28PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Um, sorry but I'm not following... where does freshen come to play in the
bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104066 mentioned
in the patch? Freshen won't even tou
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:08:28PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Um, sorry but I'm not following... where does freshen come to play in the
> bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104066 mentioned
> in the patch? Freshen won't even touch the other package there because the
>
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:29:45AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
What JBJ does here is checks HDRID for identifying identical packages if
present, version comparison if not. But I don't think it's actually
identicality of headers (or not) we're real
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:29:45AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> What JBJ does here is checks HDRID for identifying identical packages if
> present, version comparison if not. But I don't think it's actually
> identicality of headers (or not) we're really interested in here but
> upgradability
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 10:29 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> For full background see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104066. And yes I do
> think it's a bug that we should fix.
>
> I'd rather just use rpmdsCompare() for the check rather than add yet
> another codepath for
For full background see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104066. And yes I do
think it's a bug that we should fix.
What JBJ does here is checks HDRID for identifying identical packages if
present, version comparison if not. But I don't think it's actually
identicality of