Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %missingok is undocumented (Issue #2833)

2024-02-21 Thread Panu Matilainen
Closed #2833 as completed via b2638067fce9a32cba03f5c0198ea50a33ff6d3d. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2833#event-11874285931 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %missingok is undocumented (Issue #2833)

2024-01-08 Thread Panu Matilainen
There's just one flag for it all (`RPMFILE_MISSINGOK`) so `%config(missingok)` equals `%config %missingok`. The standalone `%missingok` was only added in 2016 (8efe51e8c24b7739f0bf7680e21083c8964633f5) so relatively late. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %missingok is undocumented (Issue #2833)

2024-01-05 Thread Daniel Alley
%config(missingok) is documented, however, %missingok is not. Presumably there is a lot of overlap, but it is unclear if there are any distinctions in when and how they should be used. vattrtest.spec only tests %missingok, can I presume that they are equivalent in function? -- Reply to this