@pmatilai I must say that the error as well as your answer puzzles me. Just
FTR, this is the origin of the question mark:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/8e2921fd5a3125b7ce2487bb449b2e6db40cc3c0
IOW the question mark was always guarding the existence of the `load`
macro/builtin.
If
> Sorry could you tell me what's wrong in the following code?
I was able to implement the own exists macro like this. I expect `rpmlint`
skips the load. But `rpmlint` still checks the load macro printing parsing
error. Now what we need to fix is rpmlint.
```
%global exists_file %{lua:
@pmatilai I am seeing `doc/manual/lua.md` and https://rpm.org/user_doc/lua.html
. Sorry could you tell me what's wrong in the following code?
```
%load_if_exists(path) %{lua:
if posix.access(arg.path, "r") then
print("Loading " .. arg.path .. "..")
load(arg.path)
end
}
@pmatilai ok thanks I will try it!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#issuecomment-833461866___
Rpm-maint
Well you can program whatever logic you want if you use %{lua:..}
This behavior isn't changing back.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #1669.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#event-4694612288___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Reopened #1669.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#event-4689242420___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@pmatilai when using `%{load:...}`, the rpmlint failed to part the spec file.
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/issues/632 . The rpmlint can
not detect the loaded file's existence.
I see the `%{exists...}` is still new in RPM 4.17.
http://rpm.org/user_doc/macros.html
Is there
Closed #1669.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#event-4688478118___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Thanks! I confirmed it works with `%{load: ...}`. I would close this ticket.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Thanks for the info! Let me check it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#issuecomment-832605314___
%{load:...} works as always but any undocumented special behaviors of
conditionals on built-in macros are gone in 4.17, %{?foo} always tests whether
said macro is defined or not, both built-ins and user-defined macros.
Conditional load can be constructed with more control using expressions and
I can try to create a minimal reproducer if you want.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
13 matches
Mail list logo
