Merged #3034 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3034#event-12482993321
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint
Excellent, thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3034#issuecomment-2058321276
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint
Ok, done.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3034#issuecomment-2056819462
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@mlschroe pushed 1 commit.
2e3cf5f4629a6f3372451dabe35b58fdf69692bd Add testcases for Ed25519 and NIST
P-256
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3034/files/a7a9a1df6f972282d472bf58ea0d89895f0a30a6..2e3cf5f4629a6f3372451dabe35b58fdf69692bd
You are
I can add both an ed25519 and an nist p-256 key test.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3034#issuecomment-2056750547
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Clearly it's Monday - took me a few moments to see the difference to
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/23770e1a4f28c56a31fe600cae332c77333b60b6
:sweat_smile:
I'd be wary of adding any default rule there but clearly ECDSA belongs to DSA
as much as EDDSA does, no objection
Maybe we should put all unknown algorithms into the DSA slots. I think the
distinction was just done so that very old rpm versions didn't trip when they
saw a non-rsa signature. Another reason could have been to allow both signing
with the old RSA/MD5 (for compat reasons) and the new DSA/SHA1
See also 23770e1a4f28c56a31fe600cae332c77333b60b6
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3034#issuecomment-2051692148
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Key import and verification already works, its just that rpm does not know
where to put the signature.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3034
-- Commit Summary --
* Allow signing with ECDSA keys
-- File
