Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Document %setup and %patch, officially deprecating %patchN (PR #2352)

2023-06-27 Thread Jun Aruga
Just note for someone including me who wants to know what RPM versions have this change. I can see the backported commit is on the rpm-4.18.x branch. And the RPM version 4.18.1 includes the commit. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/c90144e2f899e4a5e053ecf899b1c4036be3e35c

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Document %setup and %patch, officially deprecating %patchN (PR #2352)

2023-01-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
@pmatilai commented on this pull request. > +-c create the build directory (and change to it) before unpacking +-D do not delete the build directory prior to unpacking (used +when more than one source is to be unpacked with `-a` or `-b`) +-n DIR set the name

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Document %setup and %patch, officially deprecating %patchN (PR #2352)

2023-01-17 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #2352 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2352#event-8244184427 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Document %setup and %patch, officially deprecating %patchN (PR #2352)

2023-01-16 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
@DemiMarie commented on this pull request. > +It accepts a number of options. With the exception of `-P`, they are merely +pass the option down to the `patch` command. ```suggestion It accepts a number of options. With the exception of `-P`, they are merely passed down to the `patch` command.

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Document %setup and %patch, officially deprecating %patchN (PR #2352)

2023-01-16 Thread Panu Matilainen
Document %setup and %patch in the reference manual, even if briefly. Convert our own %patch uses in the testsuite to modern syntaxes and officially deprecate the stupid %patchN syntax so we may some day actually get rid of it. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: