They're not scripts, and will not become such, it makes no sense really. For
script generated files section there's already -f. The difference to %changelog
is that a changelog is not a build result, it's something that exists before it.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
So if they were scripts, the output of the script could be used as changelog /
file list
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2768#discussioncomment-7590337
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
I don't know what you mean by that. %prep, %build, %install etc are shell
scripts, %files and %changelogs are static data that rpm parses.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2768#discussioncomment-7584794
You are
Can the `%changelog` section being made similar to others, such as `%prep`,
`%build`, etc? Thinking of this, can `%files` section be more similar to those
as well 樂
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Pretty much all distros have at least the option of pulling the spec changelog
from an external source - namely the package SCM (dist-git in the Fedora
world). There have been various suggestions to make rpm better integrate with
this, such as
-
