Thanks for the patches! Merged.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/299#issuecomment-321481240___
Rpm-maint mailing
@ignatenkobrain pushed 1 commit.
408605d add tests for with/without rich operators
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
It works like expected. You can't use and/or/if with with/without, because
with/without work on package sets. You may only use or/with/without in sets.
Just re-arrange your expressions.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
so I ran some tests I had in #164, so seems like nested richops doesn't play
well..
```
+error: line 9: Illegal ops in with/without: Requires: (deptest-two with
(flavor = dekstop and featured))
+error: line 9: Illegal ops in with/without: Requires: (deptest-two with
(flavor = dekstop if
Here's my attempt to implement with/without deps. I (mis)used the dbiIndexSet
functions for set management, using tag==0 for rpmdb packages and tag==1 for
rpmal packages. I guess some test coverage would also be nice, but I'll be on
vacation the next three weeks. Please step in to add tests. ;)
