Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Run build scriptlets with closed stdin to enforce unattended builds (PR #2898)

2024-02-12 Thread Panu Matilainen
Merged #2898 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2898#event-11784579272 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mail

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Run build scriptlets with closed stdin to enforce unattended builds (PR #2898)

2024-02-12 Thread Panu Matilainen
I only remember a couple of tickets where the issue was rpmbuild being interactive, eg #978. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2898#issuecomment-1938331913 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Run build scriptlets with closed stdin to enforce unattended builds (PR #2898)

2024-02-12 Thread Florian Festi
I would have sworn we actually did prevent that. I remember people being unhappy about it. I remember this being added before. But may be my mind is playing tricks on me. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2898#issuecomment-

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Run build scriptlets with closed stdin to enforce unattended builds (PR #2898)

2024-02-12 Thread Panu Matilainen
Even max-rpm philosophy section points out that rpm builds are unattended, but then we do nothing at all to prevent it? I first though maybe this regressed when we switched the build scripts to use rpmfcExec() a few years ago, but there wasn't anything before that either. Weird. You can view, co