Closed #2233 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2233#event-7614349188
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint
@nwalfield: then there is no bug, closing.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2233#issuecomment-1282830219
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
In `pgpPrtParams`, [`rpm-sequoia` checks that there is exactly one signature
packet](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm-sequoia/blob/main/src/lib.rs#L951).
Can you please provide a reproducer for this bug.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Can you explain what you are trying to accomplish. Is your claim that an rpm
signature should be exactly one signature package and a literal data packet?
Out of curiosity, how are multiple signatures handled in rpm?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
This is enforced by the current in-tree parser, but (presumably) not by the
Sequoia parser. It does not require parsing the contents at all, merely the
framing. I am willing to make a patch.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
