@DemiMarie commented on this pull request.
Thanks for the feedback @pmatilai.
> @@ -426,6 +426,11 @@ static int pgpVersion(const uint8_t *h, size_t hlen,
> uint8_t *version)
return 0;
}
+int pgpSignatureType(pgpDigParams _digp) {
+assert(_digp->tag == PGPTAG_SIGNATURE);
That is a
@DemiMarie pushed 1 commit.
17c93c31eceed4cd9a3e78385756f4804c047f50 verifySignature(): package signatures
must be PGPSIGTYPE_BINARY
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -566,7 +566,9 @@ static rpmRC verifyDigest(struct rpmsinfo_s *sinfo)
static rpmRC
verifySignature(rpmKeyring keyring, struct rpmsinfo_s *sinfo)
{
-rpmRC res = rpmKeyringVerifySig(keyring, sinfo->sig, sinfo->ctx);
+rpmRC res = RPMRC_FAIL;
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -426,6 +426,11 @@ static int pgpVersion(const uint8_t *h, size_t hlen,
> uint8_t *version)
return 0;
}
+int pgpSignatureType(pgpDigParams _digp) {
+assert(_digp->tag == PGPTAG_SIGNATURE);
Imagine for a moment what life would be like
@DemiMarie pushed 1 commit.
f4521694942624460c7238eb7e61a52f290e35cc verifySignature(): package signatures
must be PGPSIGTYPE_BINARY
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
RPM packages are binary documents and must be signed as such.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1801
-- Commit Summary --
*
