On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 03:25:36PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 9/19/18 12:23 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 8/23/18 12:01 AM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> >> You convinced me that there should be whitelist filter, so I rewrote
> >> code for it. Follow Panu suggestion [1] I wrote .C
On 9/19/18 12:23 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 8/23/18 12:01 AM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
You convinced me that there should be whitelist filter, so I rewrote
code for it. Follow Panu suggestion [1] I wrote .C generator to filter
proper rpm tags.
Sorry for the terribly late response, I
On 8/23/18 12:01 AM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
You convinced me that there should be whitelist filter, so I rewrote
code for it. Follow Panu suggestion [1] I wrote .C generator to filter
proper rpm tags.
Sorry for the terribly late response, I keep intending and intending and
somehow
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 5:01 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
> wrote:
...
>
> Also its value may be needs a prefix for versioning tag value. When new
> tags are marked to be involve to calculating the prefix changes. I think
> the prefix should also include a vendor identifier e.g. fc, alt, mga,
>
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 5:01 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
> wrote:
>
> You convinced me that there should be whitelist filter, so I rewrote
> code for it. Follow Panu suggestion [1] I wrote .C generator to filter
> proper rpm tags. But currently it does not allow this suggestion [2] by
> jbj@:
>
>
You convinced me that there should be whitelist filter, so I rewrote
code for it. Follow Panu suggestion [1] I wrote .C generator to filter
proper rpm tags. But currently it does not allow this suggestion [2] by
jbj@:
"The members (and ordering) of the IDENTITY tag set might also
need to be
